The US, Iraq and Iran

There is no doubt that the US administration is facing a deadlock.
Any standing in Bush's shoes would know that he has a problem. Moving forward represents a problem and retreating back constitutes another problem.

As to striking Iran, I cannot anticipate a strike because this is unknown. There is an atmosphere of intimidations and its true that there is a psychological war. Even if a strike is being set for Iran, I believe that it would be either a delayed or a frozen step. Bush has no other option but to go back to the Baker-Hamilton report and start talking to Damascus and Tehran. If he were able to escape scheduling the American withdrawal from Iraq, then let it be. However this does not mean that Bush would not have anything else to do. I believe that the most dangerous thing the American administration will be focusing on in the next stage, is sectarian sedition inside and outside Iraq.

. The testimony of Olmert and others signaled to a role, not by the Americans or by the Israelis; a role played by figures, groups or governments said to have taken the decision of the war and later covered up the war. I am sure that if the secret part of the report were published, it would have confirmed our vision, our understanding of the occurrences of the war and how the war began. I believe that there is a deep problem in Israel; a problem of leadership. Knowing the problem is not enough. Are there any competent and strong leaders capable of solving these crises and problems? This is a major question,"" Sayyed Nasrallah said.

Then let him tell us how he helped, as a government which has money, eight months after the end of the war. Worth mentioning that all Arab states which said they wanted to help Lebanon have fulfilled their promises and paid money to the Lebanese government. However they are keeping this money while dealing with the reconstruction file on political basis," he added.

Winograd and Israel

On the Winograd report, which described the handling of both the Israeli political and military leaderships as serious failure, Sayyed Nasrallah said that he has no doubt that the publishing of the Winograd report was curtailed.
"Who really took the decision to go to war against Lebanon? What is behind this decision? The answers are in the secret part of the Winograd report, as well as the US-Israeli contacts which were said to have been kept secret and US-Arab contacts and Israeli ? Arab contacts.

On reconstruction, Sayyed Nasrallah said that the Waed institution has been commissioned to repair and rebuild residential units, based on a legal accreditation from the owners of these units. He added that this was done away from the media. His eminence assured that the owners will have their homes in a much better condition according to the adopted specifications. "According to the law, if a have a destroyed home, and my house is in fact destroyed, I can authorize someone to go to the Ministry of Displaced, fill the needed application and receive the compensation money. However this illegal government disabled this law and therefore I have to personally go to the Ministry, fill the application and collect the money. Even though this is not in line with the law, they took this measure just to cause obstruction," Sayyed Nasrallah said. Regardless of the legitimacy of Saniora's government, he will explain this issue on Monday. I hope that he would explains it using figures and I also hope that the people would follow these figure up. For example, let him tell us how many homes need reparation and how many are totally destroyed.

The leader of the resistance said that Hezbollah's strategy is to defend south Lebanon and all of Lebanon in case of any attack.
"Frankly speaking, we are not waiting for authorization from anyone. When the government assumes its responsibility to defend the country, we will become its soldiers. We will celebrate when the occupied Shebaa Farms return to Lebanon, even if they return it with diplomatic means and I doubt this. But let it be known that in case Lebanon gains back the Farms, it will be because there is resistance in this country, not because of anyone's smiles or tears," his eminence explained

"We could have told them that we are also a fundamental power in this country and we want partnership. However we chose to meet them half way and proposed to let the people decide. We are ready for anything including early elections. There is a problem regarding presidential election and General Michel Aoun proposed that the President be elected by the people, and uproar ensued.
We see in letting the people decide so as to solve any crisis, a very normal choice. Electing the President directly by the people is a democratic, civilized, interesting and developed idea."
Sayyed Nasrallah accused the ruling bloc of undermining referendum since it is not stated in the constitution. "Whenever the ruling bloc wants to find a way out of a crisis, they amend the constitution," he said. His eminence added that he does not insist on referendum. "I am with early elections," he said.