Correcting a Deadly Practice (HRW)
Kenneth Roth - Haaretz
Another sample of HRW way of misrepresenting facts.
The way a government or armed group responds to a Human Rights Watch report says a lot about its willingness to curb abuses. Does it grapple seriously with the findings or simply dismiss them? Human Rights Watch encountered a bit of each when we recently released reports on why civilians died during Israel's 2006 war with Hezbollah.
Our report on Hezbollah's rocket attacks on northern Israel addressed Hezbollah's two asserted justifications: that it was aiming only at military targets and, somewhat contradictorily, that insofar as it targeted civilians, it was in reprisal for Israeli misconduct. Human Rights Watch's detailed investigation in northern Israel demonstrated that while at times Hezbollah did aim at military targets, frequently it aimed at civilian areas with no military target in sight. The report also emphasized the laws-of-war prohibition of attacks against civilians for any reason, even as ostensible reprisal.
Another sample of HRW way of misrepresenting facts.
The way a government or armed group responds to a Human Rights Watch report says a lot about its willingness to curb abuses. Does it grapple seriously with the findings or simply dismiss them? Human Rights Watch encountered a bit of each when we recently released reports on why civilians died during Israel's 2006 war with Hezbollah.
Our report on Hezbollah's rocket attacks on northern Israel addressed Hezbollah's two asserted justifications: that it was aiming only at military targets and, somewhat contradictorily, that insofar as it targeted civilians, it was in reprisal for Israeli misconduct. Human Rights Watch's detailed investigation in northern Israel demonstrated that while at times Hezbollah did aim at military targets, frequently it aimed at civilian areas with no military target in sight. The report also emphasized the laws-of-war prohibition of attacks against civilians for any reason, even as ostensible reprisal.



Comments on this journal
Finally, as a trump card, the IDF claimed that it had secret intelligence justifying the attacks. But whatever that evidence, Human Rights Watch's investigation shows that the conclusions the IDF drew were repeatedly wrong - the supposed military targets were in fact, again and again, only civilians.
Faced with this troubling evidence, even the IDF was reluctant to confront the facts. The top IDF lawyers with whom we met noted several times that, unlike Hezbollah, the IDF did not deliberately try to kill civilians. But of course, the laws of war, not Hezbollah, provide the proper measure for Israeli conduct. The lawyers noted, correctly, that the IDF was under intense political pressure to end the Hezbollah rocket barrage on northern Israel, but it is precisely such difficult circumstances for which the laws of war are intended.
Instead, Lebanese civilians died from Israeli bombing mainly because the Israel Defense Forces took insufficient care to distinguish civilians from combatants as required by the laws of war. The IDF rightly warned civilians to flee southern Lebanon. Many did, but as the IDF knew, many others remained because they were too old or infirm to flee, too poor to pay exorbitant taxi fares charged for evacuation, or too fearful to take to the frequently bombed roads.
A week later, I released the Human Rights Watch report on Israel's conduct during the war at a press conference in Jerusalem (which was not canceled). Human Rights Watch researchers had spent five months in southern Lebanon, examining 94 attack sites representing roughly half of civilian deaths.